At that meeting, the Council voted to adopt the guidelines as a resolution of the Council (by a vote that was unanimous save for one abstention), and shortly thereafter the Council adopted them "so as to speak in the name of the Society", a more official designation.Īcting upon recommendations from the AMS Committee on the Profession, in January 2004 the Council approved a general revision to the document, which also incorporated additional statements describing and deploring plagiarism. The Committee then redrafted the guidelines and presented the redraft to the January 1995 Council. These were sent to the Committee, which considered all suggestions. Those draft guidelines were published twice in the Notices of the AMS, with a request to the membership for responses and suggestions for changes or improvements. The Committee, which consisted of Murray Gerstenhaber, Frank Gilfeather, Elliott Lieb, and Linda Keen (Chair), presented ethical guidelines for adoption by the Council. In January 1994 the AMS Council received the report of its Special Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |